| This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
| This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Cartesian other" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| An editor has determined that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Cartesian other" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Cartesian other" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
(Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In philosophy, the Cartesian other, part of a thought experiment, is any other than the mind of the individual thinking about the experiment. The Other includes the individual's own body. According to the philosopher Descartes, there is a divide intrinsic to consciousness, such that you cannot ever bridge the space between your own consciousness and that of another.
This "other" is in essence theoretical, since one cannot ever be empirically shown such an "other."
Put differently, Descartes concluded cogito ergo sum, "I think, therefore I am," that is, that the presence of a self of which to speak (an "I") proves its existence to oneself; however, according to his Wax Argument, one could never similarly demonstrate the existence of the "other."
References
